Those of us who practice Collaborative Team Divorce sometimes get asked the question: “What if my spouse isn’t willing or able to show me respect? Why then should I respect them? What’s the value of that?”
There is value to one partner offering respect as a deliberate choice of habit, on several levels:
- Business level trust is all that’s needed to support a Collaborative solution. Collaborative Practitioners are often taught to avoid the word “fair” as a relative term when it comes to solutions for couples and families facing divorce, and instead focus on the term “acceptable”. All that is needed is a solution that is acceptable to each partner – so long as it meets the needs of both partners and the children, after taking all needs into consideration as well as potential ‘legal rights’. Once a solution has the effect of a court order (meaning, a court-entered Judgment), that is a measure of safety and enforceability for the agreements which have been made. The kind of intimate-level trust that was needed to support the marriage is not needed.
- “Trust but verify” is the basis for acceptable solutions. Good quality information is needed to craft the foundation for an acceptable solution. Collaborative Financial Specialists are the professionals whose job it is to collect all the financial information which is needed, and to make it available to both partners and the Collaborative Team, including each spouse’s attorney. The reason many professionals choose to practice Collaborative Team Divorce is that they get access to financial information more quickly, and more completely, than what is often uncovered in the back-and-forth, ‘cat and mouse’ strategies of formal legal discovery. This is because Collaborative Team Practice is based upon mutual respect and staying away from tactics that trigger human defense mechanisms. In addition, Collaborative Practice can use methods which are similar to contested litigation practice, such as exchanging Release of Information Forms directly to employers and plan providers, to make sure the data is all genuine – in the event there is any question about that. If such steps are not needed, they don’t recommend the extra expense to use them.
- Children get the idea. In her 25-year study, Judith Wallerstein was sometimes quoted as reminding professionals and couples that children attach to both parents. If even one parent is healthy enough to recognize and support the connection children have to both parents, that home is a safer and happier place for children to be. Chances are, the healthier parent will over time gain more trust and a stronger connection to the children – they are drawn to the healthier parent. This can be demonstrated simply, by asking the children such questions as: “Did you know that your (X parent) plans to take you to their family’s cabin with your cousins this weekend? Isn’t that great? You know, your (X parent) and I may have had our problems, but they love you so much!” This helps to make transitions between homes more successful, and the children know that – at least in the home of the healthier parent – they can be “whole people”, safe and connected to both parents. They don’t have to deny half of who they are when they come home from school in the evening, and can look forward to feeling healthy and whole in the home of the healthier parent. It makes a difference.
So if any part of you is thinking that acting like the only grown-up in a divorce process is a waste – think again. Find a good process for your divorce proceeding, get to a solid “acceptable” agreement, and get that agreement entered by the Court as a judgment. Then, focus on the future with the realization that the agreements made are enforceable, and the home you provide your children will be what they remember.
Judy Johnson
Collaborative Team Divorce Attorney
Judith _ h _ johnson @ Hotmail.com | 952-405-2015
collaborativedivorceminnesota.com
With more than 47 years in private practice, Ms. Johnson has built a respected career dedicated to helping families navigate legal transitions with clarity, dignity, and care.
She began her career in a mid-sized Minneapolis law firm where she was immersed in a broad general practice, gaining experience in real estate, civil rights, professional license defense, personal injury, juvenile and family court, criminal law, and probate. This diverse foundation shaped her comprehensive understanding of how legal issues intersect—ultimately guiding her toward a focus on family law and alternative dispute resolution.
After many years practicing contested litigation, Ms. Johnson transitioned in 2005 to Collaborative Team Divorce. This shift reflected her growing conviction that families benefit most from a “family systems” approach—one that prioritizes healthy adjustment for parents and children as they transition into two homes. Since then, she has devoted her work to collaborative practice, helping clients reach thoughtful, durable agreements outside of court. She remains of counsel with Speeter and Johnson in downtown Minneapolis.
