Tonda as “Raggedy Andy” for Halloween
Halloween is my favorite holiday. I always dress in costume even if I am not going to a Halloween party. In the past, I have dressed as Ms. Piggy, Jacqueline Onassis Kennedy, the Medusa, a Cone Head, the Pinball Wizard, and stuck my head inside a carved pumpkin, just to name a few. It’s the time of year for tricks or treats. While treats are the standard fare, I sometimes think it would be fun to give out tricks instead.
Tricks are not appropriate, however, in your divorce process. But many people feel they have been tricked when they find out later they agreed to an ill-conceived settlement. Even if technically there had been no trickery in the settlement process, what was probably missing from it was the transparency and education needed to make informed decisions.
By using the collaborative divorce process, you and your spouse are assured of complete transparency of all facts relevant to making an informed decision about your settlement. Furthermore, you both receive the added value of consulting with the appropriate expert to thoroughly understand what the facts mean, be they financial facts, child development facts, legal facts, or communication and relational facts.
Making informed decisions is critical to achieving a successful and durable settlement customized to the future needs of your family. No tricks. And yes, treats are still possible despite a divorce.
One of the biggest mistakes we see during a divorce is trying to protect a low interest rate at all costs. At first, it sounds like the obvious choice. But let’s see what it really costs. The Situation In 2020, you purchased a home with a $350,000 mortgage on a...
Collaborative Divorce is intended to help families resolve conflict and move forward without the emotional and financial cost of litigation. Attorneys, financial professionals, and mental health neutrals all have vital roles in helping clients. However, if...
DISCLAIMER The views and opinions
expressed on this blog are
solely those of each individual
contributor, and do not
necessarily reflect the policies,
views and opinions of the
Collaborative Law Institute.